DC Art Seen

The Sound of Silence

July 3, 2009 · Leave a Comment

PAUSE
The Stamp Gallery
1220 Stamp Student Union , Adele Stamp Memorial Union, The University of Maryland
Mon–Thurs 10am-6pm, Fri-Sat 11am-4pm

One of the greatest things about art is that when it is given the proper attention, it can stop busy people dead in their tracks and give them a chance to reflect on otherwise unexplored and marginalized topics. PAUSE, an exhibition curated by Alexandra Douglas-Barrera, Fernando Ramirez and Alison Reilly at the Stamp Student Union Gallery at the University of Maryland College Park, features three artists who have chosen to use simple, elegant compositions to express deep, complicated ideas. The quiet nature of the exhibit—there is no color in any of the works—unites the variety of media in which the artists have chosen to work. There is a profound feeling of emptiness in the room, as each artist utilized scarcity and anonymity in both subject and style.

Elizabeth Crisman, Spineless, 2008, ink jet transparencies. Photo courtesy of The Stamp Student Union Gallery.

Elizabeth Crisman, Spineless, 2008, ink jet transparencies. Photo courtesy of The Stamp Gallery.

Elizabeth Crisman’s work addresses the types of information that humans leave behind, and demonstrates how little something as deeply personal as an x-ray actually says about a person. Crisman buys old x-rays on Ebay, inverts them, and then prints them as photograms on person-sized strips of black and white photo paper. She arranges the x-rays to look like bones from archaeological digs. The bones reveal nothing about the person they belong to, and the anonymous nature of the x-rays is unsettling. The x-rays are intensely private objects and yet they say nothing about who a person is. Spineless is a series of inkjet transparencies of spinal cord x-rays. They hang from the ceiling in a long line that curls onto the floor. The spine is vital in connecting the brain to the rest of the body, but these spines lead nowhere and connect to nothing but each other.

Lu Zhang, Beard 3, 2007, pen on paper. Photo courtesy of The Stemp Student Union Gallery.

Lu Zhang, Beard 3, 2007, pen on paper. Photo courtesy of The Stamp Gallery.

Lu Zhang’s series of drawings of Chinese opera props was inspired by her recent visit to China. Zhang was born in China but grew up in Oklahoma. She is very interested in issues of race and gender as well as contemporary art in China. Zhang recently took a six-month trip to China where she was exposed to local,  “homespun”* opera. The props that are used can symbolize gender, status and even morality. The idea that people can simply put on an identity is very compelling for Zhang. Zhang’s drawings feature only props, beards and headdresses, and completely leave out the actor who would occupy them. The stark, haunting drawings float on the paper, definitions defining no one.

Laura Hughes, Thaw, 2009, wood, enamel, pinecones, monofilament. Photo courtesy of The Stamp Student Union Gallery.

Laura Hughes, Thaw, 2009, wood, enamel, pinecones, monofilament. Photo courtesy of The Stamp Gallery.

Laura Hughes’ installations have a cataclysmic aesthetic. She works in wood, glass, steel, foam and chalk to create suspended moments of destruction and decay. Hughes believes that memories are stories that become further from the truth of the event with each passing moment. Thaw is an installation of suspended old wood planks stepped upwards towards an explosion of black-painted pinecones. The event that inspired the piece is unidentified, but the ragged chalk-covered wood planks and the black pinecones speak of a dark moment. The steps lead nowhere and hang precariously by transparent plastic strings. The pinecones move slightly in the wind created by the movement of people in the gallery, like a wind chime of deadening silence.

Each artist’s work is a memory of a moment and a person, nameless and concealed. Their works are like artifacts and puzzle pieces. Crisman, Zhang and Hughes force their audience to reconsider knowledge taken for granted. The artists ask for pause and reflection on about how much is actually known about this world and the individual people that inhabit it.

-Ophra Paul

PAUSE is on view at the Stamp Gallery until July 25th.

*Bmore Art, Lu Zhang at Randall Scott Gallery, Interview by Cara Ober.

I am a believer in full disclosure. Alison Reilly who writes for this blog and is a personal friend, was one of the co-curators of this exhibit. I do not believe this inhibited my ability to explain the works in the show but in fact gave me access to more information so I could better understand the exhibit.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , ,

Thick Skin

June 25, 2009 · 1 Comment

Paint Made Flesh
The Phillips Collection
1600 21st Street, NW
Tue- Sat 10am-4pm (Thur 8:30pm) Sundays 11am-6pm

The body has traditionally been used as a symbol in painting, often representing spirituality, idealized beauty and power. Paint Made Flesh, an exhibit put together by the Frist Collection, which is resting at the Phillips Collection in DC for the summer, highlights a different side of humanity, the dark conflicted and anxiety plagued side. The show is comprised of works by a multitude of artists who painted between the 1950s and the present day. The show is divided by themes, time periods and locations, making it difficult to decide where Modern ends and Contemporary begins.

Lucian Freud, Naked Man,

Lucian Freud, Naked Man, Back View, 1991–92, Oil on canvas, 72 1/4 x 54 1/8 in. (183.5 x 137.5 cm). Courtesy of the Metropolitain Museum of Art, Purchase, Lila Acheson Wallace Gift, 1993 (1993.71).

Although the two Lucian Freud’s date from 1988-89 and 1991-92, they are still very relevant and noteworthy. Freud painted from life over long periods of time and favored friends over professional models; he wanted to portray people as they are, not as they are posed to be. Hailing from the Tate Modern, Standing by the Rags is a magnificent portrait of painter Sophie de Stempel, who worked with Freud for eight years and modeled for him frequently. She is half lying, her body resting on a giant pile of Freud’s painting rags and half standing, her feet planted solidly on the hardwood floor. The perspective leans upwards and only a glimpse of a wall helps to anchor the space. De Stempel’s head rests on her right arm, which is arced over a bulge in the pile, cradled as if there were another person lying with her. Her gesture and facial expression seem to exude a comfort and trust that only close friends can have, but she does not have complete confidence in the stability of Freud’s rags and keeps her feet firmly on the ground. The second Freud painting depicts the controversial performing artist Leigh Bowery. Bowery’s back is turned and a curtain blocks the view into the studio, revealing only the distant wall that Freud used as a palette—these compositional choices speak of a more guarded relationship.

Susan Rothenberg, Crying, 2003, Oil on canvas. 58 1/2 x 63 1/2 in / 148.6. Courtesy of Waddington Galleries. x 161.3 cm

Susan Rothenberg, Crying, 2003, Oil on canvas. 58 1/2 x 63 1/2 in / 148.6. Courtesy of Waddington Galleries. x 161.3 cm

Susan Rothenberg and Tony Bevan paint expressively and reduce narratives to articulate deep, focused feelings of stress and tension. Rothenberg’s “Crying,” an entirely red and white painting—her most frequent colors, because of their fleshy human qualities—depicts a head and neck covered by four hands that seemed to have wiped any recognizable features off the face. The face, hands and arms are red and disembodied, and they emerge from the upper left through a white background that has been layered over red. The work captures the haze and wearing nature of depression. Bevan also uses red and white but in a more restrained aesthetic. The red lines that scar and illustrate “Head” seem to be abstract and cluttered up close, but from far away describe strained, stretched, balloon-like face from a skewed upwards perspective. The face seems to float away, falling apart and coming back together on upon each viewing expressing the struggle to maintain clarity in this complicated world.

Jenny Saville, Hyphen, 1999. Private Collection, Courtesy of Gagosian Gallery. © Jenny Saville

Jenny Saville, Hyphen, 1999, Oil on canvas. Private Collection, Courtesy of Gagosian Gallery. © Jenny Saville

John Currin, The Hobo, 1999, Oil on canvas. Courtesy of the Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego.

John Currin, The Hobo, 1999, Oil on canvas. Courtesy of the Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego.

Jenny Saville and John Currin are both technically accomplished painters who deal with female beauty from totally different perspectives. Saville moved around a lot as a child, always having to adjust to a new location and new people. She sees herself as an outsider and is attracted to unconventional body types. Her studies with a plastic surgeon led to a discovery of the ‘object-ness’ of flesh, and its ability to be sculpted and manipulated, strangely similar to paint. She confronts and embraces her anxieties about being different with monumental paintings, often self-portraits, which have been built up with large areas of paint layered with a roller. “Hyphen” is a double portrait of the artist and her sister, who is resting her head on Saville’s shoulder. Saville’s eyes seem to dare anyone to judge her, effectively guarding herself and her sister—who stares hesitantly but hopefully into the distance—from the harsh world. By contrast, John Currin embraces the long history of objectifying the female figure in his satirical, campy and playfully hedonistic paintings. He celebrates the ridiculousness of the obsession with a perfect female form in “Nude with Raised Arms,” daring his audience to try look away and to decide whether this smooth creamy young body emerging from a milky blackness is Venus, pornography or both. Even more bluntly camp, “The Hobo” makes fun of the way that everyone, even destitute, downtrodden people, are inexplicably beautiful on bad television. Currin does not accept any guilt for his pleasures but instead dutifully recognizes and embraces the beauty and depravity that seem inexorably intertwined in his view of the world.

Daniel Richter, Duisen, 2004, Oil on canvas, Image Size: 106 1/4 x 137 3/4 inches. Courtesy of David Zwiner Gallery.

Daniel Richter, Duisen, 2004, Oil on canvas, Image Size: 106 1/4 x 137 3/4 inches. Courtesy of David Zwiner Gallery.

German painter, Daniel Richter is concerned with music, current events, and graffiti culture. The craze that overtakes people when they take drugs and infrared pictures inform Richter’s style and present the point of view of “the paranoid westerner,”* a group which he confrontationally and bravely confesses to be a part of. Richter turns current tragic and violent news events into ambiguous paintings that could be read as celebrations. Using neon energetic colors, he layers the complications of living comfortably as part of first world culture while being surrounded by economic, environmental and military problems, both domestic and foreign. “Duisen” is a painting of a crowd of people with upraised arms, who are melting in violent Technicolor in a black cityscape background. They look as if they could be part of a rave at a concert or victims of some as yet unknown bio-weapon. Duisen is a made-up word that is play between the German words that mean millions and south. Richter is referencing the influx of immigrants to Germany from southern countries, bringing with them political, social and economic upheaval.

Paint Made Flesh includes superlative examples by artists Alice Neel, Francis Bacon, Julian Schnabel, Richard Diebekorn and De Kooning and many others that have come from first-rate museums around the world. The Frist has brought together a phenomenal group of paintings but do not expect to find bucolic and carefree works. This is a challenging exhibit that brings together many different stressful concepts and events. If you leave feeling stressed and overwhelmed than the show did exactly what it intended to do.

-Ophra Paul

Paint Made Flesh is on view at the Phillips Collection until September 1st.

*Schatz, Matthias. “Paranoid Westerner” Daniel Richter Paints Crowds, Harlequins, Terror.” Bloomberg.com (July)

**Although I currently work at The Phillips Collection as a Museum Assistant I was not involved with the planning or implementation of Paint Made Flesh. I am not a Phillips Collection spokesperson; I take personal responsibility for this article.

→ 1 CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Child’s Play

June 17, 2009 · 1 Comment

KENNY HUNTER: LIKE WATER IN WATER, NATHANIEL ROGERS: THE LAST VIKING
Conner Contemporary
1358-60 Florida Ave
Wed-Sat 11am – 5pm

Conner Contemporary Art currently has two shows up in its large space: Kenny Hunter’s Like Water in Water and Nathanial Rogers’s The Last Viking. Both shows are full of sarcasm about, and witty criticism of, contemporary society. Although the shows are presented as separate entities they both use the guise of childlike innocence to tackle large intimidating issues. Hunter and Rogers force us to face our fears by tricking us into confrontation.

Kenny Hunter Like Water in Water 2009, resin, jesmonite, steel, paint, 35.43 x 59.06 x 23.62 inches. Photo courtesy of Conner Contemporary Art.

Kenny Hunter, Like Water in Water, 2009, resin, jesmonite, steel, paint, 35.43 x 59.06 x 23.62 inches. Copyright Kenny Hunter, courtesy Conner Contemporary Art.

Kenny Hunter’s sculptures are pointedly unreal; they replicate the smooth and perfect aesthetic of caricatures and dolls. In this show, Hunter’s work addresses the human driven destruction of our planet. The sculpture after which the exhibit was titled, Like Water in Water, is a life size deer cast in resin and painted in a soft matt tan. The deer is stepping through a tire and some metal lily pads, which are a few inches off the ground thereby communicating that the visitors to the gallery and the deer are walking through a few inches of ‘water.’ The deer looks welcoming and approachable but after a few moments the realization materializes that this piece is a comment on the environment. Like the deer, we are a few inches deep in trouble.

Kenny Hunter, End Product, 2009, jesmonite, 21.65 x 21.65 x 21.65 inches 55 x 55 x 55 cm, Edition of 3. Copyright Kenny Hunter, courtesy Conner Contemporary Art.

Kenny Hunter, End Product, 2009, jesmonite, 21.65 x 21.65 x 21.65 inches 55 x 55 x 55 cm, Edition of 3. Copyright Kenny Hunter, courtesy Conner Contemporary Art.

Similarly, with End Product, an unpainted trash bag, we are met by what seems to be a banal, unassuming piece. At second glance it is realized that the paint brushes, coffee cup and banana peel that have leaked out of a hole in the bottom of the bag are a representation of the artist himself. This self-deprecating self-portrait not only heralds the artist’s own ironic participation in the destruction of out planet but imposes itself as a mirror on the viewer.

Rogers, Nimble Jack, 2009, oil on panel, 8 x 6 inches, 20.3 x 15.2cm. Images are copyright Kenny Hunter, courtesy Conner Contemporary Art

Nathaniel Rogers, Nimble Jack, 2009, oil on panel, 8 x 6 inches, 20.3 x 15.2cm. Images are copyright Kenny Hunter, courtesy Conner Contemporary Art

Nathaniel Rogers’s works uses nursery rhymes depicted in a hyper-realistic style (that any children’s book editor would covet) to address deeply disturbing psychological issues. Most of the nursery rhymes we learned as children actually were created to remember specific, usually distressing, historical events or social issues. They often were not meant for children but for adults to joke and spread gossip. In most cases the actual meaning of the poems was lost and they instead live on as meaningless entertainment. Rogers once again utilizes these catchy rhymes to talk about cultural affairs. The poem “Jack be Nimble” refers to the sport of jumping over candles—a considerably safer version of an earlier sport of jumping over bon fires. Jack is often thought to be the pirate Jack Black who was notorious for escaping from authorities. Rogers’s Nimble Jack is a commentary on self-destruction and medication. His Jack is kneeling in a bedroom, wearing an eye-patch and holding a miniature version of himself over the candle. On the dresser behind Rogers’s Jack are two empty pill bottles and the expression on Jack’s face is obviously disturbed.

Nathaniel Rogers, Jack Horner (The Last Viking), 2009, oil on panel, 6 x 8 inches, 15.2 x 20.3 cm. Images are copyright Kenny Hunter, courtesy Conner Contemporary Art.

Nathaniel Rogers, Jack Horner (The Last Viking), 2009, oil on panel, 6 x 8 inches, 15.2 x 20.3 cm. Images are copyright Kenny Hunter, courtesy Conner Contemporary Art.

In another painting, Jack Horner (The Last Viking), Rogers addresses the poem “Little Jack Horner.” The poem retells the story of the steward to the Bishop of Glasbury. The Bishop was trying to bribe King Henry VIII and Thomas Cromwell not to destroy his Abbey and steal the treasures inside. The Bishop sent the deeds to twelve English manorial estates hidden in a pie and had the trusted steward Horner deliver them. Horner, in turn, sat on the jury that convicted the Bishop of treason for being loyal to Rome and either stole, or was rewarded with the deeds to the estates. Rogers, interestingly chose himself as the model for Horner; he is wearing a Viking hat, and sitting on a lawn with a stone wall to his back, a dresser at his left and a burning model of a monastery is resting on top of a box marked ‘fragile’ in the foreground.

Conner Contemporary’s choice to exhibit these two artists work at the same time seems appropriate despite there differences in media and subject matter. By easing the viewer into their choice of subject matter, and using comforting familiar imagery the artists are able to create dialogue about often unaddressed and purposefully ignored subjects. Although Conner Contemporary is a little difficult to get to without a car, their space is great and this show makes the trip well worth the bus ride.

-Ophra Paul

KENNY HUNTER: LIKE WATER IN WATER, and NATHANIEL ROGERS: THE LAST VIKING are on view at Conner Contemporary Art until July 25.

→ 1 CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Best of Artomatic

June 14, 2009 · 1 Comment

Artomatic
55 M Street, S.E. 
Sun, Wed, Thu 12– 10pm, Fri and Sat 12– 1am

Artomatic, a non-profit, month-long art festival, is celebrating its tenth year filling unused Washington, DC office space with art. This year at 55 M Street, Artomatic has filled eight floors of office space with work by over 1000 visual artists. There is no jury or curator for Artomatic, and anyone can register. This means there are a lot of artists exhibiting in Artomatic whose goals are not to create contemporary fine art, and many who would like to meet that definition, but fall short. In this plethora of art, there are some jewels that should not be overlooked.

Jamie Wimberly, “Turn Off The Lights At The Tate,” Mixed Media, 2008. Photo courtesy of the artist.

Jamie Wimberly, “Turn Off The Lights At The Tate,” Mixed Media, 2008. Photo courtesy of the artist.

Jamie Wimberly’s “Box Icon Series” consists of small personal altars made of cabinets, wood boxes and deep-set frames that contain objects of contemporary adulation. Often the boxes include votive candles and visual and verbal puns. These altars satirize the things society worships, in particular the female nude, which is one of the most popular subjects at Artomatic. Wimberly’s current project, “Provocations,” which he is showcasing at Artomatic, addresses the excesses and influences of the contemporary art market. One of these “Provocations” contains a votive candle, parted white curtains, a nude female and a dollar bill and is titled, “Gagosian.” This piece shares its name with the notable, Larry Gagosian and his superstar gallery who have had tremendous influence over the art world and what becomes contemporary art. Another work titled “Turn Off the Lights at the Tate” features votive candles, a metal plate that says ‘TATE,’ delicate white partitioned curtains, light switches on a background of deep red wax flowers, and a female nude thinking the word ‘off’ while her arms are braced over her face. The woman seems to be begging for some privacy from the thousands who walk through The Tate Modern every day, scrutinizing the female nudes that have literally become objects forever. The irony is that in creating this satire, Wimberly has once again objectified the female nude.

Ben Tolman, The Theatre, 80 x 64 in., ink on board, 2007-2008, Photo courtesy of the artist.

Ben Tolman, The Theatre, 80 x 64 in., ink on board, 2007-2008, Photo courtesy of the artist.

For Artomatic, Ben Tolman printed a reproduction of his work, “The Theater,” an 80 x 62 inch piece that looks like a modernized version of Hieronymus Bosch’s “Earthly Delights,” one of Tolman’s favorite paintings. Tolman’s ink drawings are very intricate, and he only completes about three per year—“The Theater” took nine months to complete. Whenever Tolman begins a new project he starts with a rough idea in mind and does a light sketch in ink of the complete composition. After completing the sketch, he concentrates on individual areas allowing the arrangement and focus to mature organically as he moves throughout the image. The resulting works capture the viewer, refusing release until the entire picture has been taken in. In a large drawing like “The Theater,” this can take some time, so Tolman provided chairs in front of his booth at Artomatic. Also featured at Tolman’s space at Artomatic is a print of a drawing that Tolman completed with artist Lars Peterson as part of the Antipodes project. Antipodes is a collaborative that Tolman started between artists around the world. The collaborative creates large-scale drawings through the mail, each artist adding to the drawing and then sending it to the next artist. A portrait by Tolman will be featured at The National Portrait Gallery as part of their Outwin Boochever Portrait Competition.

Michelle Herman, Applied Research & Technology (installation view, 2008), video and science equipment, 2008. Photo coutesy of the artist.

Michelle Herman, Applied Research & Technology (installation view, 2008), video and science equipment, 2008. Photo coutesy of the artist.

The collection of science equipment on floor two of Artomatic is the work of Michelle Herman. Her 16mm films are derived from Herman’s study of “Decalcomania,” a painting technique that involves pressing two surfaces together with pigment between them and then pulling them apart, leaving fractal, textured patterns behind. Herman’s videos show the way the ink spreads and moves in water, never repeating the same pattern. The video is displayed on a piece of equipment that looks like it belongs in a science lab, and the video itself looks more like an organism growing and changing than ink blots. Herman is very interested in the way certain bacteria take on the look of ‘decalcomania.’ Herman’s videos are her way of visualizing the controlled chance that exists in nature, in art and life in general. Herman also invites the visitor to participate in her ‘experiments’ by looking through a microscope, which is attached to a live feed camera that displays the unsuspecting visitor’s eye on a screen on the table.

Elizabeth Crisman, Untitled 4, silver gelatin print, 2008. Photo courtesy of the artist.

Elizabeth Crisman, Untitled 4, silver gelatin print, 2008. Photo courtesy of the artist.

Elizabeth Crisman restructures elements of the human body and creates new large-scale compositions. By stitching together parts of the male and female body that she photographed, she addresses the psychological, as well as physical effects of the recent trend to transform the body though various medical procedures. In another series Crisman scans or photographs x-ray transparencies, rearranges them onto photosensitive paper and exposes the arrangement as a photogram. Interestingly, the sources for her compositions are completely anonymous, as the transparencies were purchased on eBay.

Tim Tate, I See Myself in a Hollywood Movie, 2008. Photo courtesy of the artist.

Tim Tate, I See Myself in a Hollywood Movie, Mixed media, 2008. Photo courtesy of the artist.

Encased in glass like tiny specimens, Tim Tate’s “Video Reliquaries” are deeply enchanting. Each round bubble of glass encloses a tiny video screen and is topped with a small glass sculpture. The smallness of the screen demands an intimate distance from the work, forcing a feeling of deep voyeurism that is most unnerving, particularly in Tate’s “I See Myself in a Hollywood Movie,” a closed circuit video that captures the viewer on the screen. The sculpture topping the piece is an old movie projector. Down beside “I See Myself in a Hollywood Movie,” is a red button that when pressed repeats Gloria Swanson’s famous line in the movie “Sunset Boulevard”—in a gruff voice so soft you have to lean in close to hear—”I’m big… it’s the movies that got small.” This work brings home the absurdity of the reality TV, fame obsessed culture we live in. Tate allows every visitor to be a star (if only on the small-screen), a desire that most participants in Artomatic seem to crave desperately.

J.T. Kirkland, Untitled, Construction-grade plywood, 96" x 144" x 1/2," 2009. Photo courtesy of the artist.

J.T. Kirkland, Untitled, Construction-grade plywood, 96" x 144" x 1/2," 2009. Photo courtesy of the artist.

There are very few artists who believe that less is more; even in this bare-bones economy, most contemporary artists (and definitely Artomatic artists) seem to have a Rococo ornamental sensibility. J.T. Kirkland’s installation at Artomatic offers an elegant critique on this subject. Kirkland did not add anything to the plywood wall of his Artomatic space. Instead, he drilled shallow holes in the board, using smaller bits toward the center, focusing attention on the surface itself as opposed to anything adorning it. Kirkland’s work is also a component of a collaborative project at Artomatic called “Space Between.” The project features three artists with similar aesthetic sensibilities who are inspired by each other’s work. The project is still in its initial stages, but it will be interesting to follow as it develops.

Corwin Levi, Mandala, ink and pencil on paper, 30x22, 2002. Photo courtesy of artist.

Corwin Levi, Mandala, pencil on paper, 30x22, 2002. Photo courtesy of artist.

Corwin Levi’s drawings provide an intimate look into the workings of his mind. The drawings are astonishingly intricate and take a long time complete. Levi may start out with a few particular ideas but continues to express new thoughts and experiences that accumulate throughout his process. According to the artist, “each piece is both a video and a frame.” They express the time period up till and throughout the completion of the work while at the same time remaining frozen artifacts. The intricate patterns provide a steady composition, but at a closer look, the elements within the patterns contain irregularity and diversity. The components of each drawing must be viewed individually in order to fully appreciate their detail, and stepping back to take in the whole means the losing those details. This can be likened to an attempt to understand a person; it is impossible to understand the whole without losing the intricate details that compose the individual.

Eric Celarier, Untitled, mixed media. Photo courtesy of Katie Bechtold.

Eric Celarier, Untitled, mixed media. Photo courtesy of Katie Bechtold.

Eric Celarier sews small computer parts and circuit boards together to create intricate quilts. His overall design gives the illusion of an aerial perspective of a highly organized and structured city; however, the details of his stitching provide evidence of a human presence in the quilt. By sewing the metal parts on the fabric, Celarier renders the quilt useless in the functional sense, but calls attention to his choice of often disposed and overlooked material.

Alexandra Zealand, Flock, Grapefruit pith, string and wood. Photo courtesy of the artist.

Alexandra Zealand, Flock, Grapefruit pith, string and wood. Photo courtesy of the artist.

Alexandra Zealand, a sculptor, collects discarded materials including coffee filters, matchsticks, and most recently grapefruit pith. With these materials she explores the human desire to prolong time until death. In her installation at Artomatic, Zealand hung small pieces of dried pith to form a cloudlike sculpture. The delicate structure sways with the slightest movement, and the individual pieces are especially engaging because of their texture and their range in color.

Since there is no curator or jury at Artomatic, there is a lot of kitsch and decorative art. This is not a bad thing, but it is unfortunate that Artomatic is not also thought of as an incubator and a stage for emerging fine artists. In looking at art in this space, it becomes necessary to imagine what an individual piece of art would look like in a gallery or museum in order to contextualize it and decide if it would belong. This tool could also be used the other way around when visiting galleries; imagining a particular work in a space like Artomatic can help diffuse the aura of the gallery and make an accurate decision about the aesthetic merits of the piece.

-Ophra Paul and Alison Reilly

Artomatic will be on view at 55 M St. until July 5th.

→ 1 CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wood Study

June 10, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Cube #4, 2009, 9.25”x9.25”x9.25,” wood and phone book (left) and Column, 2009, 15.5”x6”x6.5,” wood and phone book, (right). Photos courtesy of Project 4 Gallery

Cube #4, 2009, 9.25”x9.25”x9.25,” wood and phone book (left) and Column, 2009, 15.5”x6”x6.5,” wood and phone book, (right). Photos courtesy of Project 4 Gallery

Foon Sham
Project 4
1353 U Street NW, 3rd floor
Wed—Sat, 12—6pm

Foon Sham presents several recent sculptures in his current show at Project 4. Although his sculptures are constructed mostly of wood, Sham’s work is extremely diverse in size and format. The largest piece in the show, Monumental, nearly reaches the ceiling of the two-storey gallery, while his smallest, Wood Ring, only extends about five inches across. This diversity of installation and technique allows viewers to approach his work in several ways.

Monumental is placed in the front of the gallery and can be viewed from both the first and second floor. Initially, the sculpture appears to be composed of several types of wood in various colors, but Sham also integrates phone books, along with the wood pieces, into the sculpture. Interestingly, the patterns in the phone book pages mirror the changes in the patterning of the wood. The view from the balcony on the second floor highlights Sham’s integration of phone books into the sculpture, and overall, the use of phone book pages calls attention to the texture and color of the wood and complicates the layers of patterns. In some sculptures Sham uses pieces of hardwood like cherry, walnut, or mahogany, but in others, the wood is unfinished or pieces of the bark remain.

The changes in color and texture become most obvious in two sculptures, Cube #4 and Column, which look almost as if Sham has perfectly sliced them out of another, unknown structure. The addition of the white and yellow phone book pages creates a vibrant contrast with the wood. Although his use of recycled phone books “began in China as a comment on population and identity” he has continued to investigate the uses of “his preferred medium, wood, and its relationship to the environment.”*

In Wood Ring and Wall Spiral Sham carefully assembles thin pieces of dark and light colored wood, which are then mounted and framed. The gradual changes of the wood mimic subtle changes in shade that often occur in painting. These delicate compositions require an intimate and careful observation from the viewer.

Sham leaves gapping holes and crevasses in many of his sculptures such as Wrapture. The nearly six-foot sculpture is composed of several pieces of wood, but many of the pieces do not meet, thus creating a large crevasse in the middle, which emphasizes the hourglass shape of the sculpture and provokes curiosity in the viewer.

Foon Sham is currently a professor in the Department of Art at the University of Maryland, College Park. He also creates large-scale outdoor installations, which strongly demonstrate his architectural influences. In his most recent sculpture, Sham emphasizes the texture and pattern of his medium, and he also carefully manipulates the wood to create a new set of forms.

-Alison Reilly

Foon Sham is on view at Project 4 until June 13, 2009. 

*“Foon Sham, May 9 – June 13”. Project 4.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , ,